This should actually not be a problem with it structure; Sir John de- Keith d
Re: ? Comyn partner from Malise
Regarding Comyn child who was simply wife away from Malise regarding Strathearn, I’d theorized during the 2005 you to definitely she was indeed Margaret, identified as wife of Sir John de- Keith (see duplicate off post lower than) who was simply 2ndly elizabeth are supplied because post: new wife Emma I would recommend is actually of some other nearest and dearest, and never mother of 2nd Earl Malise.
Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan_ , states partly, ‘Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn, got a partner Emma, in the 1261-1267, whoever surname is actually not familiar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. of Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a bit ahead of 1270, with the intention that their widow (Margaret) would-have-been “available” a little while shortly after Emma.
This was naturally a conjecture; it does have the advantage of dealing with a well-known relationships between Muriel Keith and you will Reginald ce Cheyne. Any further associated files would of course become greeting.
This new membership for the Scots Peerage concerning the group of Keith claims from Sir John de Keith (d. ca. 1270) which he is considered keeps married Comyn, earl regarding Buchan . Which personality, of unclear (“said to have been”) diversity, are now able to end up being fixed based on the adopting the dispensation, old during the Fondi to the fourteen Jan 1378/9::
‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Into the bishop out-of Moray. Faculty in order to distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, away from Moray and Aberdeen dioceses, regarding obstacle to help you wedding as a result of the 3rd and you can last quantities of kissbrides.com Г¶verlГ¤gsen webbplats fГ¶r internationella studenter consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘
Muriel Keith, the near future next partner from Robert Stewart, 1st Duke away from Albany (d. 1420), was developed in order to marry Reginald le Cheyne, young man away from Sir Reginald ce Cheyne from the his partner (once the her very first spouse), Helen regarding Strathearn. Whenever you are you’ll find distinguished gaps from the origins from Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald ce Cheyne perform express an origin about Comyns. Yet not, it is too faraway to require a dispensation if the Muriel are good-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1233), which would be the case in the event the ‘s the reason child.
dos. Reginald ce Cheyne was a-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, child off Alexander Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1290), young man from William Comyn in the list above. Their young buck is actually Malise, Earl away from Strathearn out of 1312 to help you their passing during the 1328 , and you will dad out-of Reginald.
california. 1270), is same as Marjory Comyn, and you may partnered 2ndly in order to Malise, Earl from Strathearn (d. 1312). This will mean the new parentage a€?considered has been’ that of Margaret, partner of Sir John de Keith, are of you to age group: she would not have started the newest d Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan, but instead out of his young buck Alexander. There isn’t any evidence one to Earl Malise and Marjory Comyn have been partnered far in advance of 1275: while the Lindsay blogged,
There can be that discernable base on which the partnership between Reginald le Cheyne and you can Muriel Keith will have lived: in the event the Margaret Comyn, spouse out of Sir John de- Keith (d
‘ The wife on the earl, from the 1275, was entitled Marjory, even as we comprehend the attesting condition out of Zero. curriculum vitae., which can be said by Wyntoun, Guide VIII. guy. vi., having become next sibling off John Comyn, Earl off Buchan, exactly who discussed on the part of Earl Malise the marriage settlement over stated [dated at the London, April twenty six, 1293 to have their child Matilda and you can Robert de Tony, son from Ralph].’
Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy Elizabeth regarding Buchan We __________________I________________ I III 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als We Elizabeth off Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I I We We I We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Elizabeth out-of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ I I We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- Age out of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 I ce Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David I V We We de- Graham Sir William de We We__________ Keith We I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We I III I We We We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke off Albany)