Analysis Quality Comparison

New indicate studies high quality get along the 41 posts appointment introduction standards was 6.dos (eTables step 1 and you can 2 on the Complement). Two education (4.9%) dropped on low-high quality diversity, and ten training (24.4%) was from the moderate-high quality assortment, on remaining 31 education (70.7%) about large-high quality variety. Both studies deemed having lowest methodological top quality was indeed removed off analyses. Therefore, the remainder 39 education were chosen for subsequent meta-analyses.

Shot Features out-of Included Studies

A maximum of 39 training met all research and you may methodological inclusion requirements. Studies was available for delivering (n = 34), acquiring (n = 20), forwarding instead of agree (letter = 5), or which have a good sext forwarded as opposed to concur (n = 4). The new Desk summarizes integrated knowledge. Overall over the 39 education, 110 380 members was in fact integrated, having a hateful chronilogical age of decades (age range, eleven.9-17.0 ages). On average, 47.2% regarding participants was indeed men. Twenty-a couple of knowledge (56.4%) had been regarding United states, twelve degree (31.8%) had been out-of Europe, 2 education (5.1%) had been from Australian continent, step 1 studies (2.6%) are off Canada, step one study (2.6%) was away from South Africa (dos.6%), and you will step 1 analysis (dos.6%) is out of South Korea. To get knowledge (46.2%) examined sexting playing with mobiles and you can hosts, having 6 studies (fifteen.4%) having fun with servers just, fourteen education (thirty-five.9%) through cell phones just, and one research (dos.6%) delivering decreased information to own commitment. 11 training (twenty eight.2%) questioned users about sexting thru pictures, fourteen knowledge (35.9%) through images otherwise video clips, eight training (17.9%) via photo and you can/otherwise explicit messages, and you may eight studies (17.9%) thru pictures, videos, and/otherwise specific messages. Eventually, 29 training (79.5%) was basically penned within the peer-analyzed guides, and you may 8 knowledge (20.5%) have been unpublished.

Table.

Abbreviations: Both, analysis focuses primarily on sexting through possibly a mobile device or perhaps the internet; FW-P, data is targeted on if or not respondents shared others’ sexts versus their agree; FW-V, research is targeted on whether or not participants had sexts distributed to anyone else instead of its concur; Meters, sexually specific messages; Cellular, data centers on sexting via mobiles; NCPTUP, Federal Strategy to avoid Teenager and you may Unexpected Maternity; On line, data centers on sexting on the internet; P, pictures; Roentgen, research is targeted on choosing texts; S, analysis is targeted on delivering texts; Unspecified, study will not render adequate recommendations to choose the mode from sexting; V, movies.

Mutual Incidence of Delivering a great Sext

The random-effects analysis of the 34 studies on sending a sext yielded a mean prevalence of 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) ( Figure 2 ). The Egger test provided evidence that studies with smaller sample sizes had more extreme prevalence estimates (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the presence of potential outliers, and one study was identified. Heterogeneity of effect sizes remained present with (Q = , P < .001,>

Tree Plot of your own Perception Versions for every Study Found in the newest Meta-study to your Incidence from Delivering a great Sext

Revealed is a tree patch regarding education included in the meta-research. All round summation estimate to possess delivering an effective sext is fourteen.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%). NCPTUP ways Federal Promotion to avoid Teenager and you can Unplanned Pregnancy.

Good meta-regression investigation found a good linear escalation in incidence due to the fact age enhanced (b = 0.037; 95% CI, 0.024-0.050). Impact versions was and additionally moderated by https://kissbrides.com/es/mujeres-macedonias-calientes/ the seasons off data data range, having a revealed upsurge in the new frequency out-of giving an excellent sext over time (b = 0.026; 95% CI, 0.012-0.039). Messaging outlet in addition to explained ranging from-studies variability, which have a higher prevalence regarding sexting for the mobile devices (k = thirteen; thirteen.4%; 95% CI, nine.0%-17.7%) weighed against machines (k = 4; 5.5%; 95% CI, dos.3%-8.6%), where k suggests the number of education. Frequency was not moderated by the gender, geographic area, message articles, or book reputation.