Participants

All in all, 923 children responded to the new COBADI 2.0 questionnaire (Table step one). New sample comprised mainly of females (81.2%), younger (median decades = (5.2), min. = 17, max. = 50), plus in their first year within school (50.2%). Bayesian inference allows us to get to know inequitable samples with respect to gender because lets the addition of the fresh study to own programming later on. New questionnaire is actually delivered electronically in order to students studying Social Education and you can Public Really works (Universidad Pablo de- Olavide) and you can Pedagogy (UNED) inside the instructional many years and you will . There were no limitations to the contribution, without economic otherwise academic added bonus is actually offered to engage within data.

Abilities

With the George and Mallery (2003) classification, we found that the questionnaire had a high degree of overall reliability (? _Cronbach = .83 (.81–.85), Guttman’s ?6 = .86). We also found a high degree of reliability in the subscale “Competences in the use of ICT for the search and treatment of information” (? _Cronbach = .85 (.85–.89), Guttman’s ?6 = .87), moderate reliability in the subscale “Interpersonal competences in the use of ICT at university” (not considering items based on a preference scale, ? _Cronbach = .65 (.58–.7), ?6 Guttman’s ?6 = .59), and moderate reliability in the scale “Virtual and social communication tools at university” (? _Cronbach = .62 (.56–.68), Guttman’s ?6 = .51). The general descriptive results show (Table 3) that the vast majority of students have access to an Internet connection (98.2%). The time spent on the Internet is distributed among the following activities: university work (68.3%), use of social networks (63.9%) and listening to music (53.3%). It is significant that 77.8% stated that they never use Internet for gaming online, and 50.1% never use it to make new friends.

About outcomes for “Competences regarding use of ICT into the research and you will procedures of information”, we observe that both men and women students getting they have a good amount of ability about use of “google”, “internet browsers”, “digital cartography” and you may “podcasting” DateRussianGirl datingside gjennomgang. The equipment they normally use with faster warranty was “QR codes” together with production of “online presentations”. Gender change is visible regarding entry to “electronic cartography”, which have an effective Bayes grounds away from , which demonstrates that the content are times likely to are available about hypothesis one says there is a big difference between male and women college students compared to the newest hypothesis from equivalent competence between the new sexes. This shows that’s quite strong otherwise decisive research when you look at the favour of a significant difference ranging from women and men, that have a measurements of aftereffect of .34 (.17, .51). Ergo, there clearly was proof the male people enjoys higher seen skills in the electronic cartography compared to feminine college students. Which effect is actually suffered to the addition of a past shipment that have a keen r parameter of 1.5 (Bayes factor = , very good or decisive research). In terms of proficiency during the “on line demonstrations”, the outcomes inform you an effective Bayes grounds off seven.30, and therefore suggests that the data is actually 7.31 times very likely to are available in the fresh hypothesis there is actually a significant difference between men and women college students compared to the brand new theory off equal proficiency within sexes. This shows there is confident or large proof a beneficial difference in a man and you can feminine students, having a measurements of aftereffect of .twenty-eight (.10, .45). Therefore, there is facts that the men possess higher perceived proficiency for the developing “on the web demonstrations” compared to the feminine. Which feeling is actually suffered whenever together with an earlier shipments which have an r parameter of just one.5 (Bayes foundation = 5.36), due to the fact revealed in Fig. step 1.